|
|
 |
Welcome to Gender And Development Action
Online |
|
|
Over the last one decade,
GADA has been in the forefront of the struggle for gender-equity and
equality in politics and development in Nigeria. Our commitment has
been to poorest and most marginalized constituencies, of which women
comprise a disproportionately high segment. Over the years, the
organization has developed cutting – edge expertise working with a
wide range of local and international partners to implement actions
around women’s social, economic, cultural and political rights. GADA
has become a catalyst for mobilizing wome n’s
groups and their allies, linking their popular demands to policy
making enclaves and negotiating for appropriate changes.
Gender and Development
Action (GADA) is a non-profit, non-governmental organization
committed to gender equality and pursuit of sustainable development
and social justice in Nigeria. Our work promotes greater
understanding and proactive responses to gender and development
issues through research, information documentation and
dissemination, training, consultation, dialogue, advocacy and
mobilization. |
| |
|
| |
Most Current
Issue |
 |
|
Nigerian NGOs Demand Gender Justice in International
Trade
Nigerian NGOs and women’s
groups have stated that the wholesale embrace of trade
liberalization by Nigeria and other West African countries is
impacting adversely on the poorest constituencies, especially women
and rural people. This was part of the conclusions reached by
representatives of over thirty organizations drawn from various
parts of Nigeria at an Alliance Building and Strategy Development
meeting on gender and international trade. The meeting, which was
held at Excellence Hotel, Ogba, Lagos on June 15-16, 2006 was
organized by Gender and Development Action (GADA), with support from
the Open Society Initiative of West Africa (OSIWA). The meeting was
aimed at mapping the involvement of Nigerian CSOs in the gender
dimensions of economic justice issues, especially international
trade. It also aimed at building a loose coalition of committed
groups and developing a strategy by which they would collectively
influence trade policies from a gender perspective as well as
progressively track the differential impacts of trade liberalization
on women and men in Nigeria. Director of GADA, Ada Agina-Ude stated:
“GADA as an organization is concerned about the worsening level of
poverty among women. Despite various poverty reduction efforts from
government and civil society, poverty seems to be insurmountable.
This is in spite of the liberalization of trade at the regional and
international levels in the context of economic reforms. A deeper
look reveals that women and men do not have an equal playing field
in the international and local trade arenas.” She noted that “while
international trade could be a tool for poverty reduction and wealth
creation, our experience in this part of the world has been one of
deepening poverty for women producers and their families as a
consequence of trade liberalization. It is imperative for us as
civil society to have a common voice in the struggle to spread trade
gains more equitably between women and men as well as between
developing and developed countries. We need to step up awareness on
the dangers of wholesale trade liberalization. We need to examine
the impacts of trade policy on women and develop effective advocacy
instruments with which we can influence trade policies so that women
could benefit more from trade opportunities”. Tijah Bolton-Akpan,
GADA Programme Officer asked: “Nigeria has been a member of the
World Trade Organisation since 1995 but what do we have to show for
it in terms of trade gains”? He stated further: “As if the unfair
terms of trade in the WTO and its so-called Doha Development Round
is not enough, our government seems bent on entering new bilateral
and plurilateral trade pacts, especially with the US and the EU,
under terms that have been rejected even under the WTO. This is
unacceptable in the context of poverty reduction and efforts to
achieve the MDGs because such terms are further undermining the
capacity of our local producers, particularly women, to compete and
trade themselves out of poverty.”
|
|
Posted on >> 17th October
2006 |
| |
| |